Next: Semi-Elliptical Sampling Regions
Up: Perceptual Contrast, Symmetry and
Previous: Application
The points generated by the interest map I(p) suffer from reduced accuracy due
to the simplifications Sela proposes. Furthermore, these points return
the center of regions of interest and not the contours or structure of the
regions. We have investigated the use of the symmetry line data to
reconstruct the ``blob'' detected at p. The lines of symmetry at multiple
scales and orientation do contain information about the structure of the
region of symmetric enclosure. However, due to the many simplifications
imposed upon the calculation, the data involved are compressed and
the computation of this ``inverse symmetry transformation'' does not possess the
accuracy needed to properly segment the ``blob'' for our purposes. A more
accurate description of the ``blob'' would require a higher quality version of
the symmetry transform.
Consequently, we propose the use of a high quality, but slower, symmetry
transform as a post-processing stage to the previously described real-time
interest operator. The significant points generated by the interest map I(p)
serve as points of attention for this higher quality analysis. However, we do
not attempt to actually invert the symmetry lines generated by this
calculation to approximate the blob's contour. Instead, the annular sampling
regions used to detect symmetry are deformed to function as templates for the
specific shapes to be identified. This technique is similar to template
matching. However, it utilizes the principles of symmetric enclosure to
detect the desired blob and not merely the intersection of a template with
edge data. This restricts the false alarms that might trigger simple template
matching (as shown later in Figure ). The following
derivations outline the development of a symmetric enclosure measure for
deformable annular sampling regions.
Next: Semi-Elliptical Sampling Regions
Up: Perceptual Contrast, Symmetry and
Previous: Application
Tony Jebara
2000-06-23